Evolutionary history of life
|Part of a series on|
The evolutionary history of life on Earth traces the processes by which living and fossil organisms have evolved since life on the planet first originated until the present day. Earth formed about 4.5 Ga (billion years ago) and life appeared on its surface within 1 billion years. The similarities between all present-day organisms indicate the presence of a common ancestor from which all known species have diverged through the process of evolution.1
Microbial mats of coexisting bacteria and archaea were the dominant form of life in the early Archean and many of the major steps in early evolution are thought to have taken place within them.2 The evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, around 3.5 Ga, eventually led to the oxygenation of the atmosphere, beginning around 2.4 Ga.3 The earliest evidence of eukaryotes (complex cells with organelles) dates from 1.85 Ga,45 and while they may have been present earlier, their diversification accelerated when they started using oxygen in their metabolism. Later, around 1.7 Ga, multicellular organisms began to appear, with differentiated cells performing specialised functions.6 Bilateria, animals with a front and a back, appeared by 555 million years ago.7
The earliest land plants date back to around 450 Ma (million years ago),8 although evidence suggests that microbes formed the earliest terrestrial ecosystems, at least 2.9 Ga ago.9 Microbes are thought to have paved the way for the inception of land plants in the Phanerozoic. Land plants were so successful that they are thought to have contributed to the late Devonian extinction event.10 Invertebrate animals appear during the Ediacaran period,11 while vertebrates originated about during the Cambrian explosion.12 During the Permian period, synapsids, including the ancestors of mammals, dominated the land,13 but most of this group became extinct in the Permian–Triassic extinction event .14 During the recovery from this catastrophe, archosaurs became the most abundant land vertebrates;15 one archosaur group, the dinosaurs, dominated the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.16 After the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event killed off the dinosaurs,17 mammals increased rapidly in size and diversity.18 Such mass extinctions may have accelerated evolution by providing opportunities for new groups of organisms to diversify.19
- 1 Earliest history of Earth
- 2 Earliest evidence for life on Earth
- 3 Origins of life on Earth
- 4 Environmental and evolutionary impact of microbial mats
- 5 Diversification of eukaryotes
- 6 Sexual reproduction and multicellular organisms
- 7 Emergence of animals
- 8 Colonization of land
- 9 Dinosaurs, birds and mammals
- 10 Flowering plants
- 11 Social insects
- 12 Humans
- 13 Mass extinctions
- 14 See also
- 15 Footnotes
- 16 References
- 17 Further reading
- 18 External links
The oldest meteorite fragments found on Earth are about 4.54 billion years old; this, coupled primarily with the dating of ancient lead deposits, has put the estimated age of Earth at around that time.21 The Moon has the same composition as Earth's crust but does not contain an iron-rich core like the Earth's. Many scientists think that about 40 million years later a body the size of Mars struck the Earth, throwing into orbit crust material that formed the Moon. Another hypothesis is that the Earth and Moon started to coalesce at the same time but the Earth, having much stronger gravity than the early Moon, attracted almost all the iron particles in the area.22
Until 2001, the oldest rocks found on Earth were about 3.8 Ga.23 24 25 26 leading scientists to believe that the Earth's surface had been molten until then. Accordingly, they named this part of Earth's history the Hadean eon, whose name means "hellish".27 However analysis of zircons formed 4.4 billion years ago indicates that Earth's crust solidified about 100 Ma after the planet's formation and that the planet quickly acquired oceans and an atmosphere, which may have been capable of supporting life.28 29
Evidence from the Moon indicates that from 4 billion to 3.8 billion years ago it suffered a Late Heavy Bombardment by debris that was left over from the formation of the Solar System, and the Earth should have experienced an even heavier bombardment due to its stronger gravity.2730 While there is no direct evidence of conditions on Earth 4 billion to 3.8 billion years ago, there is no reason to think that the Earth was not also affected by this late heavy bombardment.31 This event may well have stripped away any previous atmosphere and oceans; in this case gases and water from comet impacts may have contributed to their replacement, although volcanic outgassing on Earth would have supplied at least half.32 However, if subsurface microbial life had evolved by this point, it would have survived the bombardment.33
The earliest identified organisms were minute and relatively featureless, and their fossils look like small rods, which are very difficult to tell apart from structures that arise through abiotic physical processes. The oldest undisputed evidence of life on Earth, interpreted as fossilized bacteria, dates to 3 Ga.34contradictory Other finds in rocks dated to about 3.5 Ga have been interpreted as bacteria,35 with geochemical evidence also seeming to show the presence of life 3.8 Ga.36 However these analyses were closely scrutinized, and non-biological processes were found which could produce all of the "signatures of life" that had been reported.3738 While this does not prove that the structures found had a non-biological origin, they cannot be taken as clear evidence for the presence of life. Geochemical signatures from rocks deposited 3.4 Ga have been interpreted as evidence for life,3439 although these statements have not been thoroughly examined by critics.
Biologists reason that all living organisms on Earth must share a single last universal ancestor, because it would be virtually impossible that two or more separate lineages could have independently developed the many complex biochemical mechanisms common to all living organisms.4142 As previously mentioned the earliest organisms for which fossil evidence is available are bacteria, cells far too complex to have arisen directly from non-living materials.43 The lack of fossil or geochemical evidence for earlier organisms has left plenty of scope for hypotheses, which fall into two main groups: 1) that life arose spontaneously on Earth or 2) that it was "seeded" from elsewhere in the Universe.44
The idea that life on Earth was "seeded" from elsewhere in the Universe dates back at least to the Greek philosopher Anaximander in the sixth century BCE.45 In the twentieth century it was proposed by the physical chemist Svante Arrhenius,46 by the astronomers Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe,47 and by molecular biologist Francis Crick and chemist Leslie Orgel.48 There are three main versions of the "seeded from elsewhere" hypothesis: from elsewhere in our Solar System via fragments knocked into space by a large meteor impact, in which case the most credible sources are Mars49 and Venus;50 by alien visitors, possibly as a result of accidental contamination by micro-organisms that they brought with them;48 and from outside the Solar System but by natural means.4649 Experiments suggest that some micro-organisms can survive the shock of being catapulted into space and some can survive exposure to radiation for several days, but there is no proof that they can survive in space for much longer periods.49 Scientists are divided over the likelihood of life arising independently on Mars,51 or on other planets in our galaxy.49
Life on Earth is based on carbon and water. Carbon provides stable frameworks for complex chemicals and can be easily extracted from the environment, especially from carbon dioxide. The only other element with similar chemical properties, silicon, forms much less stable structures and, because most of its compounds are solids, would be more difficult for organisms to extract. Water is an excellent solvent and has two other useful properties: the fact that ice floats enables aquatic organisms to survive beneath it in winter; and its molecules have electrically negative and positive ends, which enables it to form a wider range of compounds than other solvents can. Other good solvents, such as ammonia, are liquid only at such low temperatures that chemical reactions may be too slow to sustain life, and lack water's other advantages.52 Organisms based on alternative biochemistry may however be possible on other planets.53
Research on how life might have emerged unaided from non-living chemicals focuses on three possible starting points: self-replication, an organism's ability to produce offspring that are very similar to itself; metabolism, its ability to feed and repair itself; and external cell membranes, which allow food to enter and waste products to leave, but exclude unwanted substances.54 Research on abiogenesis still has a long way to go, since theoretical and empirical approaches are only beginning to make contact with each other.5556
Even the simplest members of the three modern domains of life use DNA to record their "recipes" and a complex array of RNA and protein molecules to "read" these instructions and use them for growth, maintenance and self-replication. This system is far too complex to have emerged directly from non-living materials.43 The discovery that some RNA molecules can catalyze both their own replication and the construction of proteins led to the hypothesis of earlier life-forms based entirely on RNA.57 These ribozymes could have formed an RNA world in which there were individuals but no species, as mutations and horizontal gene transfers would have meant that the offspring in each generation were quite likely to have different genomes from those that their parents started with.58 RNA would later have been replaced by DNA, which is more stable and therefore can build longer genomes, expanding the range of capabilities a single organism can have.585960 Ribozymes remain as the main components of ribosomes, modern cells' "protein factories".61
Although short self-replicating RNA molecules have been artificially produced in laboratories,62 doubts have been raised about where natural non-biological synthesis of RNA is possible.63 The earliest "ribozymes" may have been formed of simpler nucleic acids such as PNA, TNA or GNA, which would have been replaced later by RNA.6465
In 2003 it was proposed that porous metal sulfide precipitates would assist RNA synthesis at about 100 °C (212 °F) and ocean-bottom pressures near hydrothermal vents. Under this hypothesis, lipid membranes would be the last major cell components to appear and, until then, the proto-cells would be confined to the pores.66
A series of experiments starting in 1997 showed that early stages in the formation of proteins from inorganic materials including carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide could be achieved by using iron sulfide and nickel sulfide as catalysts. Most of the steps required temperatures of about 100 °C (212 °F) and moderate pressures, although one stage required 250 °C (482 °F) and a pressure equivalent to that found under 7 kilometres (4.3 mi) of rock. Hence it was suggested that self-sustaining synthesis of proteins could have occurred near hydrothermal vents.67
It has been suggested that double-walled "bubbles" of lipids like those that form the external membranes of cells may have been an essential first step.68 Experiments that simulated the conditions of the early Earth have reported the formation of lipids, and these can spontaneously form liposomes, double-walled "bubbles", and then reproduce themselves. Although they are not intrinsically information-carriers as nucleic acids are, they would be subject to natural selection for longevity and reproduction. Nucleic acids such as RNA might then have formed more easily within the liposomes than they would have outside.69
RNA is complex and there are doubts about whether it can be produced non-biologically in the wild.63 Some clays, notably montmorillonite, have properties that make them plausible accelerators for the emergence of an RNA world: they grow by self-replication of their crystalline pattern; they are subject to an analog of natural selection, as the clay "species" that grows fastest in a particular environment rapidly becomes dominant; and they can catalyze the formation of RNA molecules.70 Although this idea has not become the scientific consensus, it still has active supporters.71
Research in 2003 reported that montmorillonite could also accelerate the conversion of fatty acids into "bubbles", and that the "bubbles" could encapsulate RNA attached to the clay. These "bubbles" can then grow by absorbing additional lipids and then divide. The formation of the earliest cells may have been aided by similar processes.72
Microbial mats are multi-layered, multi-species colonies of bacteria and other organisms that are generally only a few millimeters thick, but still contain a wide range of chemical environments, each of which favors a different set of micro-organisms.74 To some extent each mat forms its own food chain, as the by-products of each group of micro-organisms generally serve as "food" for adjacent groups.75
Stromatolites are stubby pillars built as microbes in mats slowly migrate upwards to avoid being smothered by sediment deposited on them by water.74 There has been vigorous debate about the validity of alleged fossils from before 3 Ga,76 with critics arguing that so-called stromatolites could have been formed by non-biological processes.37 In 2006 another find of stromatolites was reported from the same part of Australia as previous ones, in rocks dated to 3.5 Ga.77
In modern underwater mats the top layer often consists of photosynthesizing cyanobacteria which create an oxygen-rich environment, while the bottom layer is oxygen-free and often dominated by hydrogen sulfide emitted by the organisms living there.75 It is estimated that the appearance of oxygenic photosynthesis by bacteria in mats increased biological productivity by a factor of between 100 and 1,000. The reducing agent used by oxygenic photosynthesis is water, which is much more plentiful than the geologically produced reducing agents required by the earlier non-oxygenic photosynthesis.78 From this point onwards life itself produced significantly more of the resources it needed than did geochemical processes.79 Oxygen is toxic to organisms that are not adapted to it, but greatly increases the metabolic efficiency of oxygen-adapted organisms.8081 Oxygen became a significant component of Earth's atmosphere about 2.4 Ga.82 Although eukaryotes may have been present much earlier,8384 the oxygenation of the atmosphere was a prerequisite for the evolution of the most complex eukaryotic cells, from which all multicellular organisms are built.85 The boundary between oxygen-rich and oxygen-free layers in microbial mats would have moved upwards when photosynthesis shut down overnight, and then downwards as it resumed on the next day. This would have created selection pressure for organisms in this intermediate zone to acquire the ability to tolerate and then to use oxygen, possibly via endosymbiosis, where one organism lives inside another and both of them benefit from their association.2
Cyanobacteria have the most complete biochemical "toolkits" of all the mat-forming organisms. Hence they are the most self-sufficient of the mat organisms and were well-adapted to strike out on their own both as floating mats and as the first of the phytoplankton, providing the basis of most marine food chains.2
|This section requires expansion. (October 2012)|
Eukaryotes may have been present long before the oxygenation of the atmosphere,83 but most modern eukaryotes require oxygen, which their mitochondria use to fuel the production of ATP, the internal energy supply of all known cells.85 In the 1970s it was proposed and, after much debate, widely accepted that eukaryotes emerged as a result of a sequence of endosymbioses between "procaryotes". For example: a predatory micro-organism invaded a large procaryote, probably an archaean, but the attack was neutralized, and the attacker took up residence and evolved into the first of the mitochondria; one of these chimeras later tried to swallow a photosynthesizing cyanobacterium, but the victim survived inside the attacker and the new combination became the ancestor of plants; and so on. After each endosymbiosis began, the partners would have eliminated unproductive duplication of genetic functions by re-arranging their genomes, a process which sometimes involved transfer of genes between them.888990 Another hypothesis proposes that mitochondria were originally sulfur- or hydrogen-metabolising endosymbionts, and became oxygen-consumers later.91 On the other hand mitochondria might have been part of eukaryotes' original equipment.92
There is a debate about when eukaryotes first appeared: the presence of steranes in Australian shales may indicate that eukaryotes were present 2.7 Ga;84 however an analysis in 2008 concluded that these chemicals infiltrated the rocks less than 2.2 Ga and prove nothing about the origins of eukaryotes.93 Fossils of the alga Grypania have been reported in 1.85 Ga rocks (originally dated to 2.1 Ga but later revised5), and indicates that eukaryotes with organelles had already evolved.94 A diverse collection of fossil algae were found in rocks dated between 1.5 and 1.4 Ga.95 The earliest known fossils of fungi date from 1.43 Ga.96
Plastids are thought to have originated from endosymbiotic cyanobacteria. The symbiosis evolved around 1500 million years ago and enabled eukaryotes to carry out oxygenic photosynthesis.97 Three evolutionary lineages have since emerged in which the plastids are named differently: chloroplasts in green algae and plants, rhodoplasts in red algae and cyanelles in the glaucophytes.
The defining characteristics of sexual reproduction in eukaryotes are meiosis and fertilization. There is much genetic recombination in this kind of reproduction, in which offspring receive 50% of their genes from each parent,98 in contrast with asexual reproduction, in which there is no recombination. Bacteria also exchange DNA by bacterial conjugation, the benefits of which include resistance to antibiotics and other toxins, and the ability to utilize new metabolites.99 However conjugation is not a means of reproduction, and is not limited to members of the same species – there are cases where bacteria transfer DNA to plants and animals.100
On the other hand, bacterial transformation is clearly an adaptation for transfer of DNA between bacteria of the same species. Bacterial transformation is a complex process involving the products of numerous bacterial genes and can be regarded as a bacterial form of sex.101102 This process occurs naturally in at least 67 prokaryotic species (in seven different phyla).103 Sexual reproduction in eukaryotes may have evolved from bacterial transformation.104 (Also see Evolution of sexual reproduction#Origin of sexual reproduction.)
The disadvantages of sexual reproduction are well-known: the genetic reshuffle of recombination may break up favorable combinations of genes; and since males do not directly increase the number of offspring in the next generation, an asexual population can out-breed and displace in as little as 50 generations a sexual population that is equal in every other respect.98 Nevertheless the great majority of animals, plants, fungi and protists reproduce sexually. There is strong evidence that sexual reproduction arose early in the history of eukaryotes and that the genes controlling it have changed very little since then.105 How sexual reproduction evolved and survived is an unsolved puzzle.106
The Red Queen Hypothesis suggests that sexual reproduction provides protection against parasites, because it is easier for parasites to evolve means of overcoming the defenses of genetically identical clones than those of sexual species that present moving targets, and there is some experimental evidence for this. However there is still doubt about whether it would explain the survival of sexual species if multiple similar clone species were present, as one of the clones may survive the attacks of parasites for long enough to out-breed the sexual species.98 Furthermore, contrary to the expectations of the Red Queen Hypothesis, Hanley et al. found that the prevalence, abundance and mean intensity of mites was significantly higher in sexual geckos than in asexuals sharing the same habitat.107 In addition, Parker, after reviewing numerous genetic studies on plant disease resistance, failed to find a single example consistent with the concept that pathogens are the primary selective agent responsible for sexual reproduction in the host.108
The Mutation Deterministic Hypothesis assumes that each organism has more than one harmful mutation and the combined effects of these mutations are more harmful than the sum of the harm done by each individual mutation. If so, sexual recombination of genes will reduce the harm that bad mutations do to offspring and at the same time eliminate some bad mutations from the gene pool by isolating them in individuals that perish quickly because they have an above-average number of bad mutations. However the evidence suggests that the MDH's assumptions are shaky, because many species have on average less than one harmful mutation per individual and no species that has been investigated shows evidence of synergy between harmful mutations.98 Further criticisms of this hypothesis are discussed in the article Evolution of sexual reproduction#Removal of deleterious genes
The random nature of recombination causes the relative abundance of alternative traits to vary from one generation to another. This genetic drift is insufficient on its own to make sexual reproduction advantageous, but a combination of genetic drift and natural selection may be sufficient. When chance produces combinations of good traits, natural selection gives a large advantage to lineages in which these traits become genetically linked. On the other hand, the benefits of good traits are neutralized if they appear along with bad traits. Sexual recombination gives good traits the opportunities to become linked with other good traits, and mathematical models suggest this may be more than enough to offset the disadvantages of sexual reproduction.106 Other combinations of hypotheses that are inadequate on their own are also being examined.98
The adaptive function of sex today remains a major unresolved issue in biology. The competing models to explain the adaptive function of sex were reviewed by Birdsell and Wills.110 The hypotheses discussed above all depend on possible beneficial effects of random genetic variation produced by genetic recombination. An alternative view is that sex arose, and is maintained, as a process for repairing DNA damage, and that the genetic variation produced is an occasionally beneficial byproduct.104111 (See also Evolution of sexual reproduction.)
The simplest definitions of "multicellular", for example "having multiple cells", could include colonial cyanobacteria like Nostoc. Even a professional biologist's definition such as "having the same genome but different types of cell" would still include some genera of the green alga Volvox, which have cells that specialize in reproduction.112 Multicellularity evolved independently in organisms as diverse as sponges and other animals, fungi, plants, brown algae, cyanobacteria, slime moulds and myxobacteria.5113 For the sake of brevity this article focuses on the organisms that show the greatest specialization of cells and variety of cell types, although this approach to the evolution of complexity could be regarded as "rather anthropocentric".114
The initial advantages of multicellularity may have included: more efficient sharing of nutrients that are digested outside the cell,116 increased resistance to predators, many of which attacked by engulfing; the ability to resist currents by attaching to a firm surface; the ability to reach upwards to filter-feed or to obtain sunlight for photosynthesis;117 the ability to create an internal environment that gives protection against the external one;114 and even the opportunity for a group of cells to behave "intelligently" by sharing information.115 These features would also have provided opportunities for other organisms to diversify, by creating more varied environments than flat microbial mats could.117
Multicellularity with differentiated cells is beneficial to the organism as a whole but disadvantageous from the point of view of individual cells, most of which lose the opportunity to reproduce themselves. In an asexual multicellular organism, rogue cells which retain the ability to reproduce may take over and reduce the organism to a mass of undifferentiated cells. Sexual reproduction eliminates such rogue cells from the next generation and therefore appears to be a prerequisite for complex multicellularity.117
The available evidence indicates that eukaryotes evolved much earlier but remained inconspicuous until a rapid diversification around 1 Ga. The only respect in which eukaryotes clearly surpass bacteria and archaea is their capacity for variety of forms, and sexual reproduction enabled eukaryotes to exploit that advantage by producing organisms with multiple cells that differed in form and function.117
The Francevillian Group Fossil, dated to 2.1 Ga, is the earliest known fossil organism that is clearly multicellular.20 This may have had differentiated cells.118 Another early multicellular fossil, Qingshania,note 1 dated to 1.7 Ga, appears to consist of virtually identical cells. The red alga called Bangiomorpha, dated at 1.2 Ga, is the earliest known organism that certainly has differentiated, specialized cells, and is also the oldest known sexually reproducing organism.117 The 1.43 billion-year-old fossils interpreted as fungi appear to have been multicellular with differentiated cells.96 The "string of beads" organism Horodyskia, found in rocks dated from 1.5 Ga to 900 Ma, may have been an early metazoan;5 however it has also been interpreted as a colonial foraminiferan.109
Animals are multicellular eukaryotes,note 2 and are distinguished from plants, algae, and fungi by lacking cell walls.120 All animals are motile,121 if only at certain life stages. All animals except sponges have bodies differentiated into separate tissues, including muscles, which move parts of the animal by contracting, and nerve tissue, which transmits and processes signals.122
The earliest widely accepted animal fossils are rather modern-looking cnidarians (the group that includes jellyfish, sea anemones and hydras), possibly from around , although fossils from the Doushantuo Formation can only be dated approximately. Their presence implies that the cnidarian and bilaterian lineages had already diverged.123
The Ediacara biota, which flourished for the last 40 Ma before the start of the Cambrian,124 were the first animals more than a very few centimeters long. Many were flat and had a "quilted" appearance, and seemed so strange that there was a proposal to classify them as a separate kingdom, Vendozoa.125 Others, however, been interpreted as early molluscs (Kimberella126127), echinoderms (Arkarua128), and arthropods (Spriggina,129 Parvancorina130). There is still debate about the classification of these specimens, mainly because the diagnostic features which allow taxonomists to classify more recent organisms, such as similarities to living organisms, are generally absent in the Ediacarans. However there seems little doubt that Kimberella was at least a triploblastic bilaterian animal, in other words significantly more complex than cnidarians.131
The small shelly fauna are a very mixed collection of fossils found between the Late Ediacaran and Mid Cambrian periods. The earliest, Cloudina, shows signs of successful defense against predation and may indicate the start of an evolutionary arms race. Some tiny Early Cambrian shells almost certainly belonged to molluscs, while the owners of some "armor plates", Halkieria and Microdictyon, were eventually identified when more complete specimens were found in Cambrian lagerstätten that preserved soft-bodied animals.132
In the 1970s there was already a debate about whether the emergence of the modern phyla was "explosive" or gradual but hidden by the shortage of Pre-Cambrian animal fossils.132 A re-analysis of fossils from the Burgess Shale lagerstätte increased interest in the issue when it revealed animals, such as Opabinia, which did not fit into any known phylum. At the time these were interpreted as evidence that the modern phyla had evolved very rapidly in the "Cambrian explosion" and that the Burgess Shale's "weird wonders" showed that the Early Cambrian was a uniquely experimental period of animal evolution.134 Later discoveries of similar animals and the development of new theoretical approaches led to the conclusion that many of the "weird wonders" were evolutionary "aunts" or "cousins" of modern groups135 – for example that Opabinia was a member of the lobopods, a group which includes the ancestors of the arthropods, and that it may have been closely related to the modern tardigrades.136 Nevertheless there is still much debate about whether the Cambrian explosion was really explosive and, if so, how and why it happened and why it appears unique in the history of animals.137
Most of the animals at the heart of the Cambrian explosion debate are protostomes, one of the two main groups of complex animals. One deuterostome group, the echinoderms, many of which have hard calcite "shells", are fairly common from the Early Cambrian small shelly fauna onwards.132 Other deuterostome groups are soft-bodied, and most of the significant Cambrian deuterostome fossils come from the Chengjiang fauna, a lagerstätte in China.139 The Chengjiang fossils Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia appear to be true vertebrates,140 and Haikouichthys had distinct vertebrae, which may have been slightly mineralized.141 Vertebrates with jaws, such as the Acanthodians, first appeared in the Late Ordovician.142
Adaptation to life on land is a major challenge: all land organisms need to avoid drying-out and all those above microscopic size have to resist gravity; respiration and gas exchange systems have to change; reproductive systems cannot depend on water to carry eggs and sperm towards each other.143144 Although the earliest good evidence of land plants and animals dates back to the Ordovician Period ( ), and a number of microorganism lineages made it onto land much earlier,145 modern land ecosystems only appeared in the late Devonian, about .146
Oxygen is a potent oxidant whose accumulation in terrestrial atmosphere resulted from the development of photosynthesis over 3 Ga, in blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), which were the most primitive oxygenic photosynthetic organisms. Brown algae (seaweeds) accumulate inorganic mineral antioxidants such as rubidium, vanadium, zinc, iron, copper, molybdenum, selenium and iodine which is concentrated more than 30,000 times the concentration of this element in seawater. Protective endogenous antioxidant enzymes and exogenous dietary antioxidants helped to prevent oxidative damage. Most marine mineral antioxidants act in the cells as essential trace-elements in redox and antioxidant metallo-enzymes.
When plants and animals began to transfer from the sea to rivers and land about 500 Ma ago, environmental deficiency of these marine mineral antioxidants and iodine, was a challenge to the evolution of terrestrial life.147148 Terrestrial plants slowly optimized the production of “new” endogenous antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, polyphenols, flavonoids, tocopherols etc. A few of these appeared more recently, in last 200-50 Ma ago, in fruits and flowers of angiosperm plants.
In fact, angiosperms (the dominant type of plant today) and most of their antioxidant pigments evolved during the late Jurassic Period. Plants employ antioxidants to defend their structures against reactive oxygen species produced during photosynthesis. Animals are exposed to the same oxidants, and they have evolved endogenous enzymatic antioxidant systems.149 Iodine is the most primitive and abundant electron-rich essential element in the diet of marine and terrestrial organisms, and as iodide acts as an electron-donor and has this ancestral antioxidant function in all iodide-concentrating cells from primitive marine algae to more recent terrestrial vertebrates.150
Before the colonization of land, soil, a combination of mineral particles and decomposed organic matter, did not exist. Land surfaces would have been either bare rock or unstable sand produced by weathering. Water and any nutrients in it would have drained away very quickly.146
Films of cyanobacteria, which are not plants but use the same photosynthesis mechanisms, have been found in modern deserts, and only in areas that are unsuitable for vascular plants. This suggests that microbial mats may have been the first organisms to colonize dry land, possibly in the Precambrian. Mat-forming cyanobacteria could have gradually evolved resistance to desiccation as they spread from the seas to tidal zones and then to land.146 Lichens, which are symbiotic combinations of a fungus (almost always an ascomycete) and one or more photosynthesizers (green algae or cyanobacteria),151 are also important colonizers of lifeless environments,146 and their ability to break down rocks contributes to soil formation in situations where plants cannot survive.151 The earliest known ascomycete fossils date from in the Silurian.146
Soil formation would have been very slow until the appearance of burrowing animals, which mix the mineral and organic components of soil and whose feces are a major source of the organic components.146 Burrows have been found in Ordovician sediments, and are attributed to annelids ("worms") or arthropods.146152
In aquatic algae, almost all cells are capable of photosynthesis and are nearly independent. Life on land required plants to become internally more complex and specialized: photosynthesis was most efficient at the top; roots were required in order to extract water from the ground; the parts in between became supports and transport systems for water and nutrients.143153
Spores of land plants, possibly rather like liverworts, have been found in Mid Ordovician rocks dated to about . In Mid Silurian rocks there are fossils of actual plants including clubmosses such as Baragwanathia; most were under 10 centimetres (3.9 in) high, and some appear closely related to vascular plants, the group that includes trees.153
By the late Devonian , trees such as Archaeopteris were so abundant that they changed river systems from mostly braided to mostly meandering, because their roots bound the soil firmly.154 In fact they caused a "Late Devonian wood crisis",155 because:
- They removed more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reducing the greenhouse effect and thus causing an ice age in the Carboniferous period.156 In later ecosystems the carbon dioxide "locked up" in wood is returned to the atmosphere by decomposition of dead wood. However, the earliest fossil evidence of fungi that can decompose wood also comes from the Late Devonian.157
- The increasing depth of plants' roots led to more washing of nutrients into rivers and seas by rain. This caused algal blooms whose high consumption of oxygen caused anoxic events in deeper waters, increasing the extinction rate among deep-water animals.156
Animals had to change their feeding and excretory systems, and most land animals developed internal fertilization of their eggs. The difference in refractive index between water and air required changes in their eyes. On the other hand, in some ways movement and breathing became easier, and the better transmission of high-frequency sounds in air encouraged the development of hearing.144
Some trace fossils from the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary about are interpreted as the tracks of large amphibious arthropods on coastal sand dunes, and may have been made by euthycarcinoids,158 which are thought to be evolutionary "aunts" of myriapods.159 Other trace fossils from the Late Ordovician a little over probably represent land invertebrates, and there is clear evidence of numerous arthropods on coasts and alluvial plains shortly before the Silurian-Devonian boundary, about , including signs that some arthropods ate plants.160 Arthropods were well pre-adapted to colonise land, because their existing jointed exoskeletons provided protection against desiccation, support against gravity and a means of locomotion that was not dependent on water.161
The fossil record of other major invertebrate groups on land is poor: none at all for non-parasitic flatworms, nematodes or nemerteans; some parasitic nematodes have been fossilized in amber; annelid worm fossils are known from the Carboniferous, but they may still have been aquatic animals; the earliest fossils of gastropods on land date from the Late Carboniferous, and this group may have had to wait until leaf litter became abundant enough to provide the moist conditions they need.144
The earliest confirmed fossils of flying insects date from the Late Carboniferous, but it is thought that insects developed the ability to fly in the Early Carboniferous or even Late Devonian. This gave them a wider range of ecological niches for feeding and breeding, and a means of escape from predators and from unfavorable changes in the environment.162 About 99% of modern insect species fly or are descendants of flying species.163
Tetrapods, vertebrates with four limbs, evolved from other rhipidistian fish over a relatively short timespan during the Late Devonian ( ).166 The early groups are grouped together as Labyrinthodontia. They retained aquatic, fry-like tadpoles, a system still seen in modern amphibians. From the 1950s to the early 1980s it was thought that tetrapods evolved from fish that had already acquired the ability to crawl on land, possibly in order to go from a pool that was drying out to one that was deeper. However, in 1987, nearly complete fossils of Acanthostega from about showed that this Late Devonian transitional animal had legs and both lungs and gills, but could never have survived on land: its limbs and its wrist and ankle joints were too weak to bear its weight; its ribs were too short to prevent its lungs from being squeezed flat by its weight; its fish-like tail fin would have been damaged by dragging on the ground. The current hypothesis is that Acanthostega, which was about 1 metre (3.3 ft) long, was a wholly aquatic predator that hunted in shallow water. Its skeleton differed from that of most fish, in ways that enabled it to raise its head to breathe air while its body remained submerged, including: its jaws show modifications that would have enabled it to gulp air; the bones at the back of its skull are locked together, providing strong attachment points for muscles that raised its head; the head is not joined to the shoulder girdle and it has a distinct neck.164
The Devonian proliferation of land plants may help to explain why air breathing would have been an advantage: leaves falling into streams and rivers would have encouraged the growth of aquatic vegetation; this would have attracted grazing invertebrates and small fish that preyed on them; they would have been attractive prey but the environment was unsuitable for the big marine predatory fish; air-breathing would have been necessary because these waters would have been short of oxygen, since warm water holds less dissolved oxygen than cooler marine water and since the decomposition of vegetation would have used some of the oxygen.164
Later discoveries revealed earlier transitional forms between Acanthostega and completely fish-like animals.167 Unfortunately there is then a gap (Romer's gap) of about 30 Ma between the fossils of ancestral tetrapods and Mid Carboniferous fossils of vertebrates that look well-adapted for life on land. Some of these look like early relatives of modern amphibians, most of which need to keep their skins moist and to lay their eggs in water, while others are accepted as early relatives of the amniotes, whose waterproof skin enables them to live and breed far from water.165
Amniotes, whose eggs can survive in dry environments, probably evolved in the Late Carboniferous period (synapsids and sauropsids, date from around .169170 The synapsid pelycosaurs and their descendants the therapsids are the most common land vertebrates in the best-known Permian ( ) fossil beds. However at the time these were all in temperate zones at middle latitudes, and there is evidence that hotter, drier environments nearer the Equator were dominated by sauropsids and amphibians.171). The earliest fossils of the two surviving amniote groups,
The Permian-Triassic extinction wiped out almost all land vertebrates,172 as well as the great majority of other life.173 During the slow recovery from this catastrophe, estimated to have taken 30 million years,174 a previously obscure sauropsid group became the most abundant and diverse terrestrial vertebrates: a few fossils of archosauriformes ("ruling lizard forms") have been found in Late Permian rocks,175 but, by the Mid Triassic, archosaurs were the dominant land vertebrates. Dinosaurs distinguished themselves from other archosaurs in the Late Triassic, and became the dominant land vertebrates of the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods ( ).176
During the Late Jurassic, birds evolved from small, predatory theropod dinosaurs.177 The first birds inherited teeth and long, bony tails from their dinosaur ancestors,177 but some had developed horny, toothless beaks by the very Late Jurassic178 and short pygostyle tails by the Early Cretaceous.179
While the archosaurs and dinosaurs were becoming more dominant in the Triassic, the mammaliaform successors of the therapsids evolved into small, mainly nocturnal insectivores. This ecological role may have promoted the evolution of mammals, for example nocturnal life may have accelerated the development of endothermy ("warm-bloodedness") and hair or fur.180 By in the Early Jurassic there were animals that were very like today's mammals in a number of respects.181 Unfortunately there is a gap in the fossil record throughout the Mid Jurassic.182 However fossil teeth discovered in Madagascar indicate that the split between the lineage leading to monotremes and the one leading to other living mammals had occurred by .183 After dominating land vertebrate niches for about 150 Ma, the dinosaurs perished in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction ( ) along with many other groups of organisms.184 Mammals throughout the time of the dinosaurs had been restricted to a narrow range of taxa, sizes and shapes, but increased rapidly in size and diversity after the extinction,185186 with bats taking to the air within 13 Ma,187 and cetaceans to the sea within 15 Ma.188
The first plants appeared around 130 million years ago.191 The 250,000 to 400,000 species of flowering plants outnumber all other ground plants combined, and are the dominant vegetation in most terrestrial ecosystems. There is fossil evidence that flowering plants diversified rapidly in the Early Cretaceous, from ,189190 and that their rise was associated with that of pollinating insects.190 Among modern flowering plants Magnolias are thought to be close to the common ancestor of the group.189 However paleontologists have not succeeded in identifying the earliest stages in the evolution of flowering plants.189190
The social insects are remarkable because the great majority of individuals in each colony are sterile. This appears contrary to basic concepts of evolution such as natural selection and the selfish gene. In fact there are very few eusocial insect species: only 15 out of approximately 2,600 living families of insects contain eusocial species, and it seems that eusociality has evolved independently only 12 times among arthropods, although some eusocial lineages have diversified into several families. Nevertheless social insects have been spectacularly successful; for example although ants and termites account for only about 2% of known insect species, they form over 50% of the total mass of insects. Their ability to control a territory appears to be the foundation of their success.192
The sacrifice of breeding opportunities by most individuals has long been explained as a consequence of these species' unusual haplodiploid method of sex determination, which has the paradoxical consequence that two sterile worker daughters of the same queen share more genes with each other than they would with their offspring if they could breed.193 However Wilson and Hölldobler argue that this explanation is faulty: for example, it is based on kin selection, but there is no evidence of nepotism in colonies that have multiple queens. Instead, they write, eusociality evolves only in species that are under strong pressure from predators and competitors, but in environments where it is possible to build "fortresses"; after colonies have established this security, they gain other advantages through co-operative foraging. In support of this explanation they cite the appearance of eusociality in bathyergid mole rats,192 which are not haplodiploid.194
The earliest fossils of insects have been found in Early Devonian rocks from about Mazon Creek lagerstätten from the Late Carboniferous, about , include about 200 species, some gigantic by modern standards, and indicate that insects had occupied their main modern ecological niches as herbivores, detritivores and insectivores. Social termites and ants first appear in the Early Cretaceous, and advanced social bees have been found in Late Cretaceous rocks but did not become abundant until the Mid Cenozoic.195, which preserve only a few varieties of flightless insect. The
The idea that, along with other life forms, modern-day humans evolved from an ancient, common ancestor was proposed by Robert Chambers in 1844 and taken up by Charles Darwin in 1871.196 Modern humans evolved from a lineage of upright-walking apes that has been traced back over to Sahelanthropus.197 The first known stone tools were made about , apparently by Australopithecus garhi, and were found near animal bones that bear scratches made by these tools.198 The earliest hominines had chimp-sized brains, but there has been a fourfold increase in the last 3 Ma; a statistical analysis suggests that hominine brain sizes depend almost completely on the date of the fossils, while the species to which they are assigned has only slight influence.199 There is a long-running debate about whether modern humans evolved all over the world simultaneously from existing advanced hominines or are descendants of a single small population in Africa, which then migrated all over the world less than 200,000 years ago and replaced previous hominine species.200 There is also debate about whether anatomically modern humans had an intellectual, cultural and technological "Great Leap Forward" under 100,000 years ago and, if so, whether this was due to neurological changes that are not visible in fossils.201
Life on Earth has suffered occasional mass extinctions at least since life on Earth. When dominance of particular ecological niches passes from one group of organisms to another, it is rarely because the new dominant group is "superior" to the old and usually because an extinction event eliminates the old dominant group and makes way for the new one.19202. Although they were disasters at the time, mass extinctions have sometimes accelerated the evolution of
The fossil record appears to show that the gaps between mass extinctions are becoming longer and the average and background rates of extinction are decreasing. Both of these phenomena could be explained in one or more ways:203
- The oceans may have become more hospitable to life over the last 500 Ma and less vulnerable to mass extinctions: dissolved oxygen became more widespread and penetrated to greater depths; the development of life on land reduced the run-off of nutrients and hence the risk of eutrophication and anoxic events; and marine ecosystems became more diversified so that food chains were less likely to be disrupted.204205
- Reasonably complete fossils are very rare, most extinct organisms are represented only by partial fossils, and complete fossils are rarest in the oldest rocks. So paleontologists have mistakenly assigned parts of the same organism to different genera, which were often defined solely to accommodate these finds – the story of Anomalocaris is an example of this. The risk of this mistake is higher for older fossils because these are often unlike parts of any living organism. Many of the "superfluous" genera are represented by fragments which are not found again and the "superfluous" genera appear to become extinct very quickly.203
Biodiversity in the fossil record, which is
- "the number of distinct genera alive at any given time; that is, those whose first occurrence predates and whose last occurrence postdates that time"206
- Constructal law
- Evolution of mammals
- Evolution of sexual reproduction
- Evolutionary history of plants
- History of evolutionary thought
- On the origin of species
- Taxonomy of commonly fossilised invertebrates
- Timeline of evolution
- Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology
- Name given as in Butterfield's paper "Bangiomorpha pubescens ..." (2000). A fossil fish, also from China, has also been named Qingshania. The name of one of these will have to change.
- Myxozoa were thought to be an exception, but are now thought to be heavily modified members of the Cnidaria: Jímenez-Guri, E., Philippe, H., Okamura, B. and Holland, P. W. H. (July 2007). "Buddenbrockia is a cnidarian worm". Science 317 (116): 116–118. Bibcode:2007Sci...317..116J. doi:10.1126/science.1142024. PMID 17615357. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Beraldi-Campesi H, Early life on land and the first terrestrial ecosystems. Ecological Processes. 2:1. doi:10.1186/2192-1709-2-1
- Futuyma, Douglas J. (2005). Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinuer Associates, Inc. ISBN 0-87893-187-2.
- Nisbet, E.G., and Fowler, C.M.R. (December 7, 1999). "Archaean metabolic evolution of microbial mats". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266 (1436): 2375. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0934. PMC 1690475. - abstract with link to free full content (PDF)
- Anbar, A.; Duan, Y.; Lyons, T.; Arnold, G.; Kendall, B.; Creaser, R.; Kaufman, A.; Gordon, G.; Scott, C.; Garvin, J.; Buick, R. (2007). "A whiff of oxygen before the great oxidation event?". Science 317 (5846): 1903–1906. Bibcode:2007Sci...317.1903A. doi:10.1126/science.1140325. PMID 17901330.
- Knoll, Andrew H.; Javaux, E.J, Hewitt, D. and Cohen, P. (2006). "Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361 (1470): 1023–38. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1843. PMC 1578724. PMID 16754612.
- Fedonkin, M. A. (March 2003). "The origin of the Metazoa in the light of the Proterozoic fossil record" (PDF). Paleontological Research 7 (1): 9–41. doi:10.2517/prpsj.7.9. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Bonner, J.T. (1998) The origins of multicellularity. Integr. Biol. 1, 27–36
- Fedonkin, M. A.; Simonetta, A.; Ivantsov, A. Y. (2007). "New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White Sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications". Geological Society, London, Special Publication2 286: 157–179. Bibcode:2007GSLSP.286..157F. doi:10.1144/SP286.12. Retrieved May 16, 2013.
- "The oldest fossils reveal evolution of non-vascular plants by the middle to late Ordovician Period (~450-440 m.y.a.) on the basis of fossil spores" Transition of plants to land
- "Early life on land and the first terrestrial ecosystems"
- Algeo, T.J.; Scheckler, S. E. (1998). "Terrestrial-marine teleconnections in the Devonian: links between the evolution of land plants, weathering processes, and marine anoxic events". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 353 (1365): 113–130. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0195.
- Chen, J-Y.; Oliveri, P; Li, CW; Zhou, GQ; Gao, F; Hagadorn, JW; Peterson, KJ; Davidson, EH (2000). "Putative phosphatized embryos from the Doushantuo Formation of China". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (9): 4457–4462. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.4457C. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4457. PMC 18256. PMID 10781044. Retrieved 2009-04-30.
- Shu et al. (November 4, 1999). "Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China". Nature 402 (6757): 42–46. Bibcode:1999Natur.402...42S. doi:10.1038/46965.
- Hoyt, Donald F. (1997). "Synapsid Reptiles".
- Barry, Patrick L. (January 28, 2002). "The Great Dying". Science@NASA. Science and Technology Directorate, Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA. Retrieved March 26, 2009.
- Tanner LH, Lucas SG & Chapman MG (2004). "Assessing the record and causes of Late Triassic extinctions" (PDF). Earth-Science Reviews 65 (1–2): 103–139. Bibcode:2004ESRv...65..103T. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00082-5. Archived from the original on October 25, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
- Benton, M.J. (2004). Vertebrate Palaeontology. Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-632-05614-2.
- Fastovsky DE, Sheehan PM (2005). "The extinction of the dinosaurs in North America". GSA Today 15 (3): 4–10. doi:10.1130/1052-5173(2005)015<4:TEOTDI>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1052-5173. Retrieved 2007-05-18.
- "Dinosaur Extinction Spurred Rise of Modern Mammals". News.nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 2009-03-08.
- Van Valkenburgh, B. (1999). "Major patterns in the history of carnivorous mammals". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 27: 463–493. Bibcode:1999AREPS..27..463V. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.463.
- El Albani, Abderrazak; Bengtson, Stefan; Canfield, Donald E.; Bekker, Andrey; Macchiarelli, Reberto; Mazurier, Arnaud; Hammarlund, Emma U.; Boulvais, Philippe et al. (July 2010). "Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago". Nature 466 (7302): 100–104. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..100A. doi:10.1038/nature09166. PMID 20596019.
- Dalrymple, G.B. (1991). The Age of the Earth. California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1569-6.
- Newman, W.L. (July 2007). "Age of the Earth". Publications Services, USGS. Retrieved 2008-08-29.
- Dalrymple, G.B. (2001). "The age of the Earth in the twentieth century: a problem (mostly) solved". Geological Society, London, Special Publications 190 (1): 205–221. Bibcode:2001GSLSP.190..205D. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.14. Retrieved 2007-09-20.
- Galimov, E.M. and Krivtsov, A.M. (December 2005). "Origin of the Earth-Moon System". J. Earth Syst. Sci. 114 (6): 593–600. Bibcode:2005JESS..114..593G. doi:10.1007/BF02715942. 
- Dalrymple, G.B. (1991). The Age of the Earth. California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1569-6.
- Newman, W.L. (July 2007). "Age of the Earth". Publications Services, USGS. Retrieved 2008-08-29.
- Dalrymple, G.B. (2001). "The age of the Earth in the twentieth century: a problem (mostly) solved". Geological Society, London, Special Publications 190 (1): 205–221. Bibcode:2001GSLSP.190..205D. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.14. Retrieved 2007-09-20.
- Cohen, B.A., Swindle, T.D. and Kring, D.A. (December 2000). "Support for the Lunar Cataclysm Hypothesis from Lunar Meteorite Impact Melt Ages". Science 290 (5497): 1754–1756. Bibcode:2000Sci...290.1754C. doi:10.1126/science.290.5497.1754. PMID 11099411. Retrieved 2008-08-31.
- "Early Earth Likely Had Continents And Was Habitable". University of Colorado. 2005-11-17. Retrieved 2009-01-11.
- Cavosie, A.J., Valley, J.W., Wilde, S. A. and the Edinburgh Ion Microprobe Facility (July 15, 2005). "Magmatic δ18O in 4400-3900 Ma detrital zircons: A record of the alteration and recycling of crust in the Early Archean". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 235 (3–4): 663–681. Bibcode:2005E&PSL.235..663C. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.028.
- Britt, R.R. (2002-07-24). "Evidence for Ancient Bombardment of Earth". Space.com. Retrieved 2006-04-15.
- Valley, J.W., Peck, W.H., King, E.M. and Wilde, S.A. (April 2002). "A cool early Earth" (PDF). Geology 30 (4): 351–354. Bibcode:2002Geo....30..351V. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0351:ACEE>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0091-7613. Retrieved 2008-09-13.
- Dauphas, N., Robert, F. and Marty, B. (December 2000). "The Late Asteroidal and Cometary Bombardment of Earth as Recorded in Water Deuterium to Protium Ratio". Icarus 148 (2): 508–512. Bibcode:2000Icar..148..508D. doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6489.
- Scalice, Daniella (May 20, 2009). "Microbial Habitability During the Late Heavy Bombardment". Astrobiology (NASA). Retrieved May 18, 2013.
- Brasier, M., McLoughlin, N., Green, O. and Wacey, D. (June 2006). "A fresh look at the fossil evidence for early Archaean cellular life" (PDF). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361 (1470): 887–902. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1835. PMC 1578727. PMID 16754605. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
- Schopf, J. W. (April 1993). "Microfossils of the Early Archean Apex Chert: New Evidence of the Antiquity of Life". Science 260 (5108): 640–646. Bibcode:1993Sci...260..640S. doi:10.1126/science.260.5108.640. PMID 11539831. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
- Altermann, W. and Kazmierczak, J. (2003). "Archean microfossils: a reappraisal of early life on Earth". Res Microbiol 154 (9): 611–7. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2003.08.006. PMID 14596897.
- Mojzsis, S.J., Arrhenius, G., McKeegan, K.D., Harrison, T.M., Nutman, A.P. and Friend, C.R.L. (November 1996). "Evidence for life on Earth before 3.8 Ga". Nature 384 (6604): 55–59. Bibcode:1996Natur.384...55M. doi:10.1038/384055a0. PMID 8900275. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
- Grotzinger, J.P. and Rothman, D.H. (1996). "An abiotic model for stomatolite morphogenesis". Nature 383 (6599): 423–425. Bibcode:1996Natur.383..423G. doi:10.1038/383423a0.
- Fedo, C.M. and Whitehouse, M.J. (May 2002). "Metasomatic Origin of Quartz-Pyroxene Rock, Akilia, Greenland, and Implications for Earth's Earliest Life". Science 296 (5572): 1448–1452. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.1448F. doi:10.1126/science.1070336. PMID 12029129. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
- Lepland, A., van Zuilen, M.A., Arrhenius, G., Whitehouse, M.J. and Fedo, C.M. (January 2005). "Questioning the evidence for Earth's earliest life — Akilia revisited". Geology 33 (1): 77–79. Bibcode:2005Geo....33...77L. doi:10.1130/G20890.1. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
- Schopf, J. (2006). "Fossil evidence of Archaean life". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361 (1470): 869–85. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1834. PMC 1578735. PMID 16754604.
- Ciccarelli, F.D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C.J. et al. (2006). "Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life". Science 311 (5765): 1283–7. Bibcode:2006Sci...311.1283C. doi:10.1126/science.1123061. PMID 16513982.
- Mason, S.F. (1984). "Origins of biomolecular handedness". Nature 311 (5981): 19–23. Bibcode:1984Natur.311...19M. doi:10.1038/311019a0. PMID 6472461.
- Orgel, L.E. (October 1994). "The origin of life on the earth" (PDF). Scientific American 271 (4): 76–83. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1094-76. PMID 7524147. Retrieved 2008-08-30. Also available as a web page
- Cowen, R. (2000). History of Life (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science. p. 6. ISBN 0-632-04444-6.
- Needs citation
- O'Leary, M.R. (2008). Anaxagoras and the Origin of Panspermia Theory. iUniverse, Inc. ISBN 0-595-49596-6.
- Arrhenius, S. (1903). "The Propagation of Life in Space". Die Umschau volume=7: 32. Bibcode:1980qel..book...32A. Reprinted in Goldsmith, D., (ed.). The Quest for Extraterrestrial Life. University Science Books. ISBN 0-19-855704-3.
- Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, C. (1979). "On the Nature of Interstellar Grains". Astrophysics and Space Science 66: 77–90. Bibcode:1979Ap&SS..66...77H. doi:10.1007/BF00648361.
- Crick, F; Orgel, L.E. (1973). "Directed Panspermia". Icarus 19 (3): 341–348. Bibcode:1973Icar...19..341C. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(73)90110-3. Unknown parameter
- Warmflash, D. and Weiss, B. (November 2005). "Did Life Come From Another World?". Scientific American 293 (5): 64–71. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-64. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Wickramasinghe, N. C.; Wickramasinghe, J. T. (2008). "On the possibility of microbiota transfer from Venus to Earth". Astrophysics and Space Science 317 (1–2): 133–137. Bibcode:2008Ap&SS.317..133W. doi:10.1007/s10509-008-9851-2.
- Ker, Than (August 2007). "Claim of Martian Life Called 'Bogus'". space.com. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Bennett, J. O. (2008). "What is life?". Beyond UFOs: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life and Its Astonishing Implications for Our Future. Princeton University Press. pp. 82–85. ISBN 0-691-13549-5. Retrieved 2009-01-11.
- Schulze-Makuch, D., Irwin, L. N. (April 2006). "The prospect of alien life in exotic forms on other worlds". Naturwissenschaften 93 (4): 155–72. Bibcode:2006NW.....93..155S. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0078-6. PMID 16525788.
- Peretó, J. (2005). "Controversies on the origin of life" (PDF). Int. Microbiol. 8 (1): 23–31. PMID 15906258. Retrieved 2007-10-07.
- Szathmáry, E. (February 2005). "Life: In search of the simplest cell". Nature 433 (7025): 469–470. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..469S. doi:10.1038/433469a. PMID 15690023. Retrieved 2008-09-01.
- Luisi, P. L., Ferri, F. and Stano, P. (2006). "Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: a review". Naturwissenschaften 93 (1): 1–13. Bibcode:2006NW.....93....1L. doi:10.1007/s00114-005-0056-z. PMID 16292523.
- Joyce, G.F. (2002). "The antiquity of RNA-based evolution". Nature 418 (6894): 214–21. Bibcode:2002Natur.418..214J. doi:10.1038/418214a. PMID 12110897.
- Hoenigsberg, H. (December 2003)). "Evolution without speciation but with selection: LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestor in Gilbert's RNA world". Genetic and Molecular Research 2 (4): 366–375. PMID 15011140. Retrieved 2008-08-30. (also available as PDF)
- Trevors, J. T. and Abel, D. L. (2004). "Chance and necessity do not explain the origin of life". Cell Biol. Int. 28 (11): 729–39. doi:10.1016/j.cellbi.2004.06.006. PMID 15563395.
- Forterre, P., Benachenhou-Lahfa, N., Confalonieri, F., Duguet, M., Elie, C. and Labedan, B. (1992). "The nature of the last universal ancestor and the root of the tree of life, still open questions". BioSystems 28 (1–3): 15–32. doi:10.1016/0303-2647(92)90004-I. PMID 1337989.
- Cech, T.R. (August 2000). "The ribosome is a ribozyme". Science 289 (5481): 878–9. doi:10.1126/science.289.5481.878. PMID 10960319. Retrieved 2008-09-01.
- Johnston, W. K. et al. (2001). "RNA-Catalyzed RNA Polymerization: Accurate and General RNA-Templated Primer Extension". Science 292 (5520): 1319–1325. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1319J. doi:10.1126/science.1060786. PMID 11358999.
- Levy, M. and Miller, S.L. (July 1998). "The stability of the RNA bases: Implications for the origin of life". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (14): 7933–8. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.7933L. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.14.7933. PMC 20907. PMID 9653118.
- Larralde, R., Robertson, M. P. and Miller, S. L. (August 1995). "Rates of decomposition of ribose and other sugars: implications for chemical evolution". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (18): 8158–60. Bibcode:1995PNAS...92.8158L. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8158. PMC 41115. PMID 7667262.
- Lindahl, T. (April 1993). "Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA". Nature 362 (6422): 709–15. Bibcode:1993Natur.362..709L. doi:10.1038/362709a0. PMID 8469282.
- Orgel, L. (November 2000). "Origin of life. A simpler nucleic acid". Science 290 (5495): 1306–7. doi:10.1126/science.290.5495.1306. PMID 11185405.
- Nelson, K.E., Levy, M., and Miller, S.L. (April 2000). "Peptide nucleic acids rather than RNA may have been the first genetic molecule". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (8): 3868–71. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.3868N. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.8.3868. PMC 18108. PMID 10760258.
- Martin, W. and Russell, M.J. (2003). "On the origins of cells: a hypothesis for the evolutionary transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes, and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 358 (1429): 59–85. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1183. PMC 1693102. PMID 12594918.
- Wächtershäuser, G. (August 2000). "Origin of life. Life as we don't know it". Science 289 (5483): 1307–8. doi:10.1126/science.289.5483.1307. PMID 10979855.
- Trevors, J.T. and Psenner, R. (2001). "From self-assembly of life to present-day bacteria: a possible role for nanocells". FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25 (5): 573–82. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00592.x. PMID 11742692.
- Segré, D., Ben-Eli, D., Deamer, D. and Lancet, D. (February–April 2001). "The Lipid World" (PDF). Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 2001 31 (1–2): 119–45. doi:10.1023/A:1006746807104. PMID 11296516. Retrieved 2008-09-01.
- Cairns-Smith, A.G. (1968). "An approach to a blueprint for a primitive organism". In Waddington, C,H. Towards a Theoretical Biology 1. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 57–66
- Ferris, J.P. (June 1999). "Prebiotic Synthesis on Minerals: Bridging the Prebiotic and RNA Worlds". Biological Bulletin. Evolution: A Molecular Point of View (Biological Bulletin, Vol. 196, No. 3) 196 (3): 311–314. doi:10.2307/1542957. JSTOR 1542957. PMID 10390828.
- Hanczyc, M.M., Fujikawa, S.M. and Szostak, Jack W. (October 2003). "Experimental Models of Primitive Cellular Compartments: Encapsulation, Growth, and Division". Science 302 (5645): 618–622. Bibcode:2003Sci...302..618H. doi:10.1126/science.1089904. PMID 14576428. Retrieved 2008-09-01.
- Hartman, H. (October 1998). "Photosynthesis and the Origin of Life". Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 28 (4–6): 512–521. doi:10.1023/A:1006548904157. Retrieved 2008-09-01.
- Krumbein, W.E., Brehm, U., Gerdes, G., Gorbushina, A.A., Levit, G. and Palinska, K.A. (2003). "Biofilm, Biodictyon, Biomat Microbialites, Oolites, Stromatolites, Geophysiology, Global Mechanism, Parahistology" (PDF). In Krumbein, W.E., Paterson, D.M., and Zavarzin, G.A. Fossil and Recent Biofilms: A Natural History of Life on Earth. Kluwer Academic. pp. 1–28. ISBN 1-4020-1597-6. Archived from the original on January 6, 2007. Retrieved 2008-07-09
- Risatti, J. B., Capman, W. C. and Stahl, D. A. (October 11, 1994). "Community structure of a microbial mat: the phylogenetic dimension" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91 (21): 10173–10177. Bibcode:1994PNAS...9110173R. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.21.10173. PMC 44980. PMID 7937858. Retrieved 2008-07-09.
- (the editor) (June 2006)). "Editor's Summary: Biodiversity rocks". Nature 441 (7094). Retrieved 2009-01-10.
- Allwood, A. C., Walter, M. R., Kamber, B. S., Marshall, C. P. and Burch, I. W. (June 2006)). "Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia". Nature 441 (7094): 714–718. Bibcode:2006Natur.441..714A. doi:10.1038/nature04764. PMID 16760969. Retrieved 2008-08-31.
- Blankenship, R.E. (1 January 2001). "Molecular evidence for the evolution of photosynthesis". Trends in Plant Science 6 (1): 4–6. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01831-8. PMID 11164357. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
- Hoehler, T.M., Bebout, B.M. and Des Marais, D.J. (19 July 2001). "The role of microbial mats in the production of reduced gases on the early Earth". Nature 412 (6844): 324–327. doi:10.1038/35085554. PMID 11460161. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
- Abele, D. (7 November 2002). "Toxic oxygen: The radical life-giver". Nature 420 (27): 27. Bibcode:2002Natur.420...27A. doi:10.1038/420027a. PMID 12422197. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
- "Introduction to Aerobic Respiration". University of California, Davis. Archived from the original on October 29, 2007. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
- Goldblatt, C., Lenton, T.M. and Watson, A.J. (2006). "The Great Oxidation at ~2.4 Ga as a bistability in atmospheric oxygen due to UV shielding by ozone" (PDF). Geophysical Research Abstracts 8 (770). Retrieved 2008-09-01.
- Glansdorff, N., Xu, Y. and Labedan, B. (2008). "The Last Universal Common Ancestor: emergence, constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner". Biology Direct 3 (29): 29. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-3-29. PMC 2478661. PMID 18613974.
- Brocks, J. J., Logan, G. A., Buick, R. and Summons, R. E. (1999). "Archaean molecular fossils and the rise of eukaryotes". Science 285 (5430): 1033–1036. doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1033. PMID 10446042. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Hedges, S. B., Blair, J. E., Venturi, M. L. and Shoe, J. L (January 2004). "A molecular timescale of eukaryote evolution and the rise of complex multicellular life". BMC Evolutionary Biology 4: 2. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-2. PMC 341452. PMID 15005799. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
- Burki, F., Shalchian-Tabrizi, K., Minge, M., Skjæveland, Å., Nikolaev (2007). "Phylogenomics Reshuffles the Eukaryotic Supergroups". In Butler, Geraldine. PLoS ONE 2 (8): e790. Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..790B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000790. PMC 1949142. PMID 17726520.
- Parfrey, L. W., Barbero, E., Lasser, E., Dunthorn, M., Bhattacharya, D., Patterson, D.J. and Katz, L.A. (December 2006). "Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity". PLoS Genetics 2 (12): e220. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220. PMC 1713255. PMID 17194223.
- Margulis, L. (1981). Symbiosis in cell evolution. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-1256-3.
- Vellai, T. and Vida, G. (1999). "The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266 (1428): 1571–1577. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0817. PMC 1690172. PMID 10467746.
- Selosse, M-A., Abert, B., and Godelle, B. (2001). "Reducing the genome size of organelles favours gene transfer to the nucleus". Trends in ecology & evolution 16 (3): 135–141. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02084-X. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Pisani, D., Cotton, J.A. and McInerney, J.O. (2007). "Supertrees disentangle the chimerical origin of eukaryotic genomes". Mol Biol Evol. 24 (8): 1752–60. doi:10.1093/molbev/msm095. PMID 17504772.
- Gray, M.W., Burger, G., and Lang, B.F. (1999). "Mitochondrial evolution". Science 283 (5407): 1476–1481. Bibcode:1999Sci...283.1476G. doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1476. PMID 10066161. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Rasmussen, B., Fletcher, I.R., Brocks, J.R. and Kilburn, M.R. (October 2008). "Reassessing the first appearance of eukaryotes and cyanobacteria". Nature 455 (7216): 1101–1104. Bibcode:2008Natur.455.1101R. doi:10.1038/nature07381. PMID 18948954.
- Han, T.M. and Runnegar, B. (July 1992). "Megascopic eukaryotic algae from the 2.1-billion-year-old negaunee iron-formation, Michigan". Science 257 (5067): 232–235. Bibcode:1992Sci...257..232H. doi:10.1126/science.1631544. PMID 1631544. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Javaux, E. J., Knoll, A. H. and Walter, M. R. (September 2004). "TEM evidence for eukaryotic diversity in mid-Proterozoic oceans". Geobiology 2 (3): 121–132. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4677.2004.00027.x. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Butterfield, N. J. (2005). "Probable Proterozoic fungi". Paleobiology 31 (1): 165–182. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031<0165:PPF>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Hedges SB, Blair JE, Venturi ML, Shoe JL (January 2004). "A molecular timescale of eukaryote evolution and the rise of complex multicellular life". BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 2. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-2. PMC 341452. PMID 15005799.
- Jokela, J. (2001). "Sex: Advantage". Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001716. ISBN 0-470-01617-5 More than one of
- Holmes, R.K. and Jobling, M.G. (1996). "Genetics: Exchange of Genetic Information". In Baron, S. Baron's Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). Galveston: University of Texas Medical Branch. ISBN 0-9631172-1-1. Retrieved 2008-09-02
- Christie, P. J. (April 2001). "Type IV secretion: intercellular transfer of macromolecules by systems ancestrally related to conjugation machines". Molecular Microbiology 40 (22): 294–305. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02302.x. PMID 11309113. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Michod RE, Bernstein H, Nedelcu AM (May 2008). "Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens". Infect. Genet. Evol. 8 (3): 267–85. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.01.002. PMID 18295550. http://www.hummingbirds.arizona.edu/Faculty/Michod/Downloads/IGE%20review%20sex.pdf
- Bernstein H, Bernstein C. (2010) Evolutionary Origin of Recombination during Meiosis. BioScience 60(7) 498-505. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.5
- Johnsborg O, Eldholm V, Håvarstein LS (December 2007). "Natural genetic transformation: prevalence, mechanisms and function". Res. Microbiol. 158 (10): 767–78. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.004. PMID 17997281.
- Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Michod RE (2012). DNA repair as the primary adaptive function of sex in bacteria and eukaryotes. Chapter 1: pp.1-49 in: DNA Repair: New Research, Sakura Kimura and Sora Shimizu editors. Nova Sci. Publ., Hauppauge, N.Y. ISBN 978-1-62100-808-8 https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=31918
- Ramesh, M. A., Malik, S-B. and Logsdon, J. M. Jr. (January 2005). "A phylogenomic inventory of meiotic genes; evidence for sex in Giardia and an early eukaryotic origin of meiosis" (PDF). Current Biology 15 (2): 185–91. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.003. PMID 15668177. Retrieved 2008-12-22.
- Otto, S. P., and Gerstein, A. C. (2006). "Why have sex? The population genetics of sex and recombination". Biochemical Society Transactions 34 (Pt 4): 519–522. doi:10.1042/BST0340519. PMID 16856849. Retrieved 2008-12-22.
- Hanley KA, Fisher RN, Case TJ (1995). Lower mite infestations in an asexual gecko compared with its sexual ancestors" Evolution 49(3) 418-426.
- Parker MA (1994). Pathogens and sex in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 8: 560-584.
- Dong, L., Xiao, S., Shen, B. and Zhou, C. (January 2008). "Silicified Horodyskia and Palaeopascichnus from upper Ediacaran cherts in South China: tentative phylogenetic interpretation and implications for evolutionary stasis". Journal of the Geological Society 165: 367–378. doi:10.1144/0016-76492007-074. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Birdsell JA, Wills C (2003). The evolutionary origin and maintenance of sexual recombination: A review of contemporary models. Evolutionary Biology Series >> Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 33 pp. 27-137. MacIntyre, Ross J.; Clegg, Michael, T (Eds.), Springer. Hardcover ISBN 978-0306472619, ISBN 0306472619 Softcover ISBN 978-1-4419-3385-0.
- Bernstein H, Hopf FA, Michod RE. (1987). The molecular basis of the evolution of sex. Adv Genet 24:323-70. Review. PMID 3324702
- Bell, G. and Mooers, A.O. (1968). "Size and complexity among multicellular organisms". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60 (3): 345–363. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01500.x. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Kaiser, D. (2001). "Building a multicellular organism". Annual Review of Genetics 35: 103–123. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090145. PMID 11700279.
- Bonner, J. T. (January 1999). "The Origins of Multicellularity". Integrative Biology 1 (1): 27–36. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6602(1998)1:1<27::AID-INBI4>3.0.CO;2-6. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Nakagaki, T., Yamada, H. and Tóth, Á. (September 2000). "Intelligence: Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism". Nature 407 (6803): 470. doi:10.1038/35035159. PMID 11028990. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Koschwanez, JH., Foster, KR, and Murray, AW (August 2011). "Sucrose Utilization in Budding Yeast as a Model for the Origin of Undifferentiated Multicellularity". PLoS Biology 9 (8): e1001122. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001122.
- Butterfield, N. J. (September 2000). "Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen., n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes". Paleobiology 26 (3): 386–404. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0386:BPNGNS>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
- Dickey, Gwyneth. "African fossils suggest complex life arose early", Science News, Washington, D.C., Wednesday, June 30th, 2010. Retrieved on 2010-07-02.
- Gaidos, E., Dubuc, T., Dunford, M., McAndrew, P., Padilla-gamiño, J., Studer, B., Weersing, K. and Stanley, S. (2007). "The Precambrian emergence of animal life: a geobiological perspective" (PDF). Geobiology 5 (4): 351. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2007.00125.x. Retrieved 2008-09-03.dead link
- Davidson, M.W. "Animal Cell Structure". Florida State University. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Saupe, S.G. "Concepts of Biology". College of St. Benedict / St. John's University. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Hinde, R. T. (1998). "The Cnidaria and Ctenophora". In Anderson, D.T.,. Invertebrate Zoology. Oxford University Press. pp. 28–57. ISBN 0-19-551368-1.
- Chen, J.-Y., Oliveri, P., Gao, F., Dornbos, S.Q., Li, C-W., Bottjer, D.J. and Davidson, E.H. (August 2002). "Precambrian Animal Life: Probable Developmental and Adult Cnidarian Forms from Southwest China" (PDF). Developmental Biology 248 (1): 182–196. doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0714. PMID 12142030. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
- Grazhdankin, D. (2004). "Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: facies versus biogeography and evolution". Paleobiology 30 (2): 203. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0203:PODITE>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373.
- Seilacher, A. (1992). "Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of Precambrian evolution" (abstract). Journal of the Geological Society, London 149 (4): 607–613. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0607. ISSN 0016-7649. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
- Martin, M.W.; Grazhdankin, D. V., Bowring, S. A., Evans, D. A. D., Fedonkin, M. A. and Kirschvink, J. L. (2000-05-05). "Age of Neoproterozoic Bilaterian Body and Trace Fossils, White Sea, Russia: Implications for Metazoan Evolution" (abstract). Science 288 (5467): 841–5. Bibcode:2000Sci...288..841M. doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.841. PMID 10797002. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
- Fedonkin, M. A. and Waggoner, B. (1997). "The late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism" (abstract). Nature 388 (6645): 868–871. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..868F. doi:10.1038/42242. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
- Mooi, R. and Bruno, D. (1999). "Evolution within a bizarre phylum: Homologies of the first echinoderms" (PDF). American Zoologist 38 (6): 965–974. Retrieved 2007-11-24.
- McMenamin, M. A. S (2003). "Spriggina is a trilobitoid ecdysozoan" (abstract). Abstracts with Programs (Geological Society of America) 35 (6): 105. Retrieved 2007-11-24.
- Lin, J. P.; Gon, S.M.; Gehling, J.G.; Babcock, L.E.; Zhao, Y.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Hu, S.X.; Yuan, J.L.; Yu, M.Y.; Peng, J. (2006). "A Parvancorina-like arthropod from the Cambrian of South China". Historical Biology 18 (1): 33–45. doi:10.1080/08912960500508689.
- Butterfield, N. J. (2006). "Hooking some stem-group "worms": fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale". BioEssays 28 (12): 1161–6. doi:10.1002/bies.20507. PMID 17120226.
- Bengtson, S. (2004). Early skeletal fossils (PDF). In Lipps, J.H., and Waggoner, B.M. "Neoproterozoic - Cambrian Biological Revolutions". Paleontological Society Papers 10. pp. 67–78. Retrieved 2008-07-18
- Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life. Hutchinson Radius. pp. 124–136 and many others. ISBN 0-09-174271-4.
- Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-30700-X.
- Budd, G. E. (2003). "The Cambrian Fossil Record and the Origin of the Phyla" (Free full text). Integrative and Comparative Biology 43 (1): 157–165. doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.157. PMID 21680420. Retrieved 2008-07-15.
- Budd, G. E. (1996). "The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem-group". Lethaia 29 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1996.tb01831.x.
- Marshall, C. R. (2006). "Explaining the Cambrian "Explosion" of Animals". Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34: 355–384. Bibcode:2006AREPS..34..355M. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.031504.103001. Retrieved 2007-11-06.
- Janvier, P. (2001). "Vertebrata (Vertebrates)". Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Wiley InterScience. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001531. ISBN 0-470-01617-5 More than one of
- Conway Morris, S. (August 2, 2003). "Once we were worms". New Scientist 179 (2406): 34. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- Shu, D-G., Luo, H-L., Conway Morris, S., Zhang, X-L., Hu, S-X., Chen, L., J. Han, J., Zhu, M., Li, Y. and Chen, L-Z. (November 1999). "Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China" (PDF). Nature 402 (6757): 42–46. Bibcode:1999Natur.402...42S. doi:10.1038/46965. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Han, J., Zhang, Z.-F., Yasui, K., Janvier, P., Chen, L., Zhang, X.-L., Liu, J.-N., Li, Y. and Liu, H.-Q. (January 2003). "Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys". Nature 421 (6922): 526–529. Bibcode:2003Natur.421..526S. doi:10.1038/nature01264. PMID 12556891. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- Sansom I. J., Smith, M. M. and Smith, M. P. (2001). "The Ordovician radiation of vertebrates". In Ahlberg, P.E. Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution. Taylor and Francis. pp. 156–171. ISBN 0-415-23370-4
- Cowen, R. (2000). History of Life (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science. pp. 120–122. ISBN 0-632-04444-6.
- Selden, P. A. (2001). ""Terrestrialization of Animals"". In Briggs, D.E.G., and Crowther, P.R. Palaeobiology II: A Synthesis. Blackwell. pp. 71–74. ISBN 0-632-05149-3. Retrieved 2008-09-05
- Battistuzzi, F. U.; Feijao, A.; Hedges, S. B. (2004). "A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land". BMC Evolutionary Biology 4: 44. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-44. PMC 533871. PMID 15535883.
- Shear, W.A. (2000). "The Early Development of Terrestrial Ecosystems". In Gee, H. Shaking the Tree: Readings from Nature in the History of Life. University of Chicago Press. pp. 169–184. ISBN 0-226-28496-4. Retrieved 2008-09-09
- Venturi, Sebastiano (2011). "Evolutionary Significance of Iodine". Current Chemical Biology- 5 (3): 155–162. doi:10.2174/187231311796765012. ISSN 1872-3136.
- Crockford, S.J. (2009). "Evolutionary roots of iodine and thyroid hormones in cell-cell signaling". Integr Comp Biol 49 (2): 155–166. doi:10.1093/icb/icp053. PMID 21669854.
- Venturi, S.; Donati, F.M.; Venturi, A.; Venturi, M. (2000). "Environmental Iodine Deficiency: A Challenge to the Evolution of Terrestrial Life?". Thyroid 10 (8): 727–9. doi:10.1089/10507250050137851. PMID 11014322.
- Küpper FC, Carpenter LJ, McFiggans GB et al. (2008). "Iodide accumulation provides kelp with an inorganic antioxidant impacting atmospheric chemistry" (Free full text). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (19): 6954–8. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.6954K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709959105. PMC 2383960. PMID 18458346.
- Hawksworth, D.L. (2001). "Lichens". Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0000368. ISBN 0-470-01617-5 More than one of
- Retallack, G.J.; Feakes, C.R. (1987). "Trace Fossil Evidence for Late Ordovician Animals on Land". Science 235 (4784): 61–63. Bibcode:1987Sci...235...61R. doi:10.1126/science.235.4784.61. PMID 17769314.
- Kenrick, P. and Crane, P. R. (September 1997). "The origin and early evolution of plants on land" (PDF). Nature 389 (6646): 33. Bibcode:1997Natur.389...33K. doi:10.1038/37918. Retrieved 2008-09-05. dead link
- Scheckler, S. E. (2001). ""Afforestation – the First Forests"". In Briggs, D.E.G., and Crowther, P.R. Palaeobiology II: A Synthesis. Blackwell. pp. 67–70. ISBN 0-632-05149-3. Retrieved 2008-09-05
- The phrase "Late Devonian wood crisis" is used at "Palaeos – Tetrapoda: Acanthostega". PALAEOS: The Trace of Life on Earth. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- Algeo, T. J. and Scheckler, S. E. (1998). "Terrestrial-marine teleconnections in the Devonian: links between the evolution of land plants, weathering processes, and marine anoxic events". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 353 (1365): 113–130. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0195. PMC 1692181.
- Taylor T. N. and Osborn J. M. (1996). "The importance of fungi in shaping the paleoecosystem". Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 90 (3–4): 249–262. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(95)00086-0. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- MacNaughton, R. B., Cole, J. M., Dalrymple, R. W., Braddy, S. J., Briggs, D. E. G. and Lukie, T. D. (May 2002). "First steps on land: Arthropod trackways in Cambrian-Ordovician eolian sandstone, southeastern Ontario, Canada". Geology 30 (5): 391–394. Bibcode:2002Geo....30..391M. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0391:FSOLAT>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0091-7613. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- Vaccari, N. E., Edgecombe, G. D. and Escudero, C. (2004). "Cambrian origins and affinities of an enigmatic fossil group of arthropods". Nature 430 (6999): 554–557. Bibcode:2004Natur.430..554V. doi:10.1038/nature02705. PMID 15282604.
- Buatois, L. A., Mangano, M. G., Genise, J. F. and Taylor, T. N. (June 1998). "The ichnologic record of the continental invertebrate invasion; evolutionary trends in environmental expansion, ecospace utilization, and behavioral complexity". PALAIOS (PALAIOS, Vol. 13, No. 3) 13 (3): 217–240. doi:10.2307/3515447. JSTOR 3515447. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
- Cowen, R. (2000). History of Life (3rd ed.). Blackwell Science. p. 126. ISBN 0-632-04444-6.
- Grimaldi, D. and Engel, M. (2005). "Insects Take to the Skies". Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. pp. 155–160. ISBN 0-521-82149-5. Retrieved 2009-01-11.
- Grimaldi, D. and Engel, M. (2005). "Diversity of evolution". Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press. p. 12. ISBN 0-521-82149-5. Retrieved 2009-01-11.
- Clack, J. A. (November, 2005). "Getting a Leg Up on Land". Scientific American. Retrieved 2008-09-06.
- Ahlberg, P. E. and Milner, A. R. (April 1994). "The Origin and Early Diversification of Tetrapods". Nature 368 (6471): 507–514. Bibcode:1994Natur.368..507A. doi:10.1038/368507a0. Retrieved 2008-09-06.
- Gordon, M. S., Graham, J. B. and Wang, T. (September/October 2004). "Revisiting the Vertebrate Invasion of the Land". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77 (5): 697–699. doi:10.1086/425182.
- Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H. and Jenkins, F. A. (April 2006). "A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan" (PDF). Nature 440 (7085): 757–763. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..757D. doi:10.1038/nature04639. PMID 16598249. Retrieved 2008-09-06.
- Debraga, M. and Rieppel, O. (July 1997). "Reptile phylogeny and the interrelationships of turtles". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 120 (3): 281–354. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1997.tb01280.x. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- Benton M. J. and Donoghue, P. C. J. (2007). "Paleontological Evidence to Date the Tree of Life". Molecular Biology and Evolution 24 (1): 26–53. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl150. PMID 17047029. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- Benton, M. J. (May 1990). "Phylogeny of the Major Tetrapod Groups: Morphological Data and Divergence Dates". Journal of Molecular Evolution 30 (5): 409–424. doi:10.1007/BF02101113. PMID 2111854. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- Sidor, C. A., O'Keefe, F. R., Damiani, R., Steyer, J. S., Smith, R. M. H., Larsson, H. C. E., Sereno, P. C., Ide, O., and Maga, A. (April 2005). "Permian tetrapods from the Sahara show climate-controlled endemism in Pangaea". Nature 434 (7035): 886–889. Bibcode:2005Natur.434..886S. doi:10.1038/nature03393. PMID 15829962. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
- Smith, R. and Botha, J. (September–October 2005). "The recovery of terrestrial vertebrate diversity in the South African Karoo Basin after the end-Permian extinction". Comptes Rendus Palevol 4 (6–7): 623–636. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.005. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
- Benton, M. J. (2005). When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest Mass Extinction of All Time. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-28573-2.
- Sahney, S. and Benton, M.J. (2008). "Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275 (1636): 759–65. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1370. PMC 2596898. PMID 18198148.
- Gauthier, J., Cannatella, D. C., de Queiroz, K., Kluge, A. G. and Rowe, T. (1989). "Tetrapod Phylogeny" (PDF). In B. Fernholm, B., Bremer K., and Jörnvall, H. The Hierarchy of Life. Elsevier Science. p. 345. Retrieved 2008-09-08
- Benton, M. J. (March 1983). "Dinosaur Success in the Triassic: a Noncompetitive Ecological Model" (PDF). Quarterly Review of Biology 58 (1). Retrieved 2008-09-08
- Padian, K. (2004). "Basal Avialae". In Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; & Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). The Dinosauria (Second ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 210–231. ISBN 0-520-24209-2.
- Hou, L., Zhou, Z., Martin, L. D. and Feduccia, A. (October 2002). "A beaked bird from the Jurassic of China". Nature 377 (6550): 616–618. Bibcode:1995Natur.377..616H. doi:10.1038/377616a0. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
- Clarke, J. A., Zhou, Z. and Zhang, F. (2006). "Insight into the evolution of avian flight from a new clade of Early Cretaceous ornithurines from China and the morphology of Yixianornis grabaui". Journal of Anatomy 208 (3): 287–308. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00534.x. PMC 2100246. PMID 16533313. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
- Ruben, J. A. and Jones, T. D. (2000). "Selective Factors Associated with the Origin of Fur and Feathers". American Zoologist 40 (4): 585–596. doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.585.
- Luo, Z-X., Crompton, A. W. and Sun, A-L. (May 2001). "A New Mammaliaform from the Early Jurassic and Evolution of Mammalian Characteristics". Science 292 (5521): 1535–1540. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1535L. doi:10.1126/science.1058476. PMID 11375489. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
- Cifelli, R.L. (November 2001). "Early mammalian radiations". Journal of Paleontology 75 (6): 1214. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2001)075<1214:EMR>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0022-3360.
- Flynn, J. J., Parrish, J. M. Rakotosamimanana, B., Simpson, W. F. and Wyss, A.R. (September 1999). "A Middle Jurassic mammal from Madagascar". Nature 401 (6748): 57–60. Bibcode:1999Natur.401...57F. doi:10.1038/43420. Retrieved 2008-09-08.
- MacLeod, N., Rawson, P. F., Forey, P. L., Banner. F. T., Boudagher-Fadel, M. K., Bown, P. R., Burnett, J. A., Chambers, P., Culver, S., Evans, S. E., Jeffery, C., Kaminski, M. A., Lord, A. R., Milner, A. C., Milner, A. R., Morris, N., Owen, E., Rosen, B. R., ,Smith, A. B., Taylor, P. D., Urquhart, E. and Young, J. R. (1997). "The Cretaceous–Tertiary biotic transition". Journal of the Geological Society 154 (2): 265–292. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.154.2.0265.
- Alroy, J. (March 1999). "The fossil record of North American mammals: evidence for a Paleocene evolutionary radiation". Systematic Biology 48 (1): 107–18. doi:10.1080/106351599260472. PMID 12078635.
- Archibald, J. D. and Deutschman, D. H. (June 2001). "Quantitative Analysis of the Timing of the Origin and Diversification of Extant Placental Orders". Journal of Mammalian Evolution 8 (2): 107–124. doi:10.1023/A:1011317930838. Retrieved 2008-09-24.
- Simmons, N. B., Seymour, K. L., Habersetzer, J. and Gunnell, G. F. (February 2008). "Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation". Nature 451 (7180): 818–821. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..818S. doi:10.1038/nature06549. PMID 18270539.
- Thewissen, J. G. M., Madar, S. I. and Hussain, S. T. (1996). "Ambulocetus natans, an Eocene cetacean (Mammalia) from Pakistan". Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 191: 1–86. ISBN 978-3-510-61084-6.
- Crane, P. R., Friis, E. M. and Pedersen, K. R. (2000). "The Origin and Early Diversification of Angiosperms". In Gee, H. Shaking the Tree: Readings from Nature in the History of Life. University of Chicago Press. pp. 233–250. ISBN 0-226-28496-4. Retrieved 2008-09-09
- Crepet, W. L. (November 2000). "Progress in understanding angiosperm history, success, and relationships: Darwin's abominably "perplexing phenomenon"". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (24): 12939–12941. Bibcode:2000PNAS...9712939C. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.24.12939. PMC 34068. PMID 11087846. Retrieved 2008-09-09.
- Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M. and Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2008-05-30). "Ancestral Monogamy Shows Kin Selection Is Key to the Evolution of Eusociality". Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 320 (5880): 1213–1216. Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1213H. doi:10.1126/science.1156108. PMID 18511689. Retrieved 2008-08-04.
- Lovegrove, B. G. (January 1991). "The evolution of eusociality in molerats (Bathyergidae): a question of risks, numbers, and costs". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28 (1): 37–45. doi:10.1007/BF00172137. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- Labandeira, C. and Eble, G. J. (2000). "The Fossil Record of Insect Diversity and Disparity" (PDF). In Anderson, J., Thackeray, F., van Wyk, B., and de Wit, M. Gondwana Alive: Biodiversity and the Evolving Biosphere. Witwatersrand University Press. Retrieved 2008-09-07
- Brunet, M., Guy, F., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T. et al. (July 2002). "A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa". Nature 418 (6894): 145–151. doi:10.1038/nature00879. PMID 12110880. Retrieved 2008-09-09.
- de Heinzelin, J., Clark, J. D., White, T. et al. (April 1999). "Environment and Behavior of 2.5-Million-Year-Old Bouri Hominids". Science 284 (5414): 625–629. doi:10.1126/science.284.5414.625. PMID 10213682. Retrieved 2008-09-09.
- De Miguel, C. and Henneberg, M. (2001). "Variation in hominid brain size: How much is due to method?". HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology 52 (1): 3–58. doi:10.1078/0018-442X-00019. Retrieved 2008-09-09.
- Leakey, Richard (1994). The Origin of Humankind. Science Masters Series. New York, NY: Basic Books. pp. 87–89. ISBN 0-465-05313-0.
- Mellars, Paul (2006). "Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago? A new model". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (25): 9381–6. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.9381M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510792103. PMC 1480416. PMID 16772383.
- Benton, M. J. (2004). "6. Reptiles Of The Triassic". Vertebrate Palaeontology (3rd ed.). Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-632-05637-8.
- MacLeod, N. (2001-01-06). "Extinction!". Retrieved 2008-09-11.
- Martin, R. E. (1995). "Cyclic and secular variation in microfossil biomineralization: clues to the biogeochemical evolution of Phanerozoic oceans". Global and Planetary Change 11 (1): 1. Bibcode:1995GPC....11....1M. doi:10.1016/0921-8181(94)00011-2.
- Martin, R.E. (1996). "Secular increase in nutrient levels through the Phanerozoic: Implications for productivity, biomass, and diversity of the marine biosphere". PALAIOS (PALAIOS, Vol. 11, No. 3) 11 (3): 209–219. doi:10.2307/3515230. JSTOR 3515230.
- Rohde, R. A. and Muller, R. A. (March 2005). "Cycles in fossil diversity" (PDF). Nature 434 (7030): 208–210. Bibcode:2005Natur.434..208R. doi:10.1038/nature03339. PMID 15758998. Retrieved 2008-09-22.
- Cowen, R. (2004). History of Life (4th ed.). Blackwell Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-4051-1756-2.
- Richard Dawkins (2004). The Ancestor's Tale, A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 0-618-00583-8.
- Richard Dawkins (1990). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-286092-5.
- Smith, John Maynard; Eörs Szathmáry (1997). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850294-X.
- Ruse, Michael; Travis, Joseph (eds) (2009). Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03175-3. Retrieved 24 November 2012.
- General information on evolution- Fossil Museum nav.
- Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley
- National Academies Evolution Resources
- Evolution poster- PDF format "tree of life"
- Everything you wanted to know about evolution by New Scientist
- Howstuffworks.com — How Evolution Works
- Synthetic Theory Of Evolution: An Introduction to Modern Evolutionary Concepts and Theories
History of evolutionary thought
- The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online
- Understanding Evolution: History, Theory, Evidence, and Implications